So for my own cathartic purpoes, three
Showing posts with label shootout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shootout. Show all posts
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Canucks 3, Blackhawks 4 (SO): Hansen's elbow, Schneider's glove and holy crap Chicago's good this year
Post-game articles are not our forté at BTD (which I'm sure you could have gleaned from this article appearing two days after the fact). But when you're a Canucks fan, games against the Blackhawks have this capacity for obsessive brooding, especially after a shootout loss.
So for my own cathartic purpoes, threequick rambling thoughts I wanted to unload before tonight's contest against Dallas:
So for my own cathartic purpoes, three
Monday, February 04, 2013
Top 5 Plays of the Month | January 2013
New CBA in hand, January began with a renewed purpose to sit for hours in front of the television. As far as first months of the season typically go for the Canucks, Schneider's Luongo's team was not half bad. With a 48-game season, much had been said about the Canucks not being able to afford their usual sluggish start.
After an unclimactic and severely embarassing home opener, it seemed like that's the direction Vancouver was headed. A final January record of 3-2-2 isn't going to do much to change the team's reputation, but signs of life abound for the reigning Presidents' Trophy winners, nonetheless.
The Canucks' first month was highlighted by 5-0 and 3-0 wins against the Ducks (returning the favour for their home opener) and Avalanche, respectively. With a different goalie in net for each win, Schneider and Luongo's matching shutouts reflected the month's central storyline in Vancouver. Whose team is this?
For the first time since the tandem was established, the pressure is squarely on Schneider to perform and it's Luongo who's playing with nothing to lose. With the exception of Schneider's shutout against Anaheim, it shows.
As pervasive as the crease drama continues to be, however, goaltending wasn't the only emerging storyline in Vancouver to start the year. It's been nine months since the Canucks' first-round exit, but playoff Edler is still here. And judging by Jason Garrison's play, he's contagious. Meanwhile, Mason Raymond actually looks like he could score 25 goals in this league again. And finally, Zack Kassian. (No explanation necessary.)
As a 3-2-2 record suggests, you take the good with the bad. Luckily, if there's one place Edler can play defence, it's in BTD's Top 5 Plays of the Month. January edition. Enjoy!
-HC
After an unclimactic and severely embarassing home opener, it seemed like that's the direction Vancouver was headed. A final January record of 3-2-2 isn't going to do much to change the team's reputation, but signs of life abound for the reigning Presidents' Trophy winners, nonetheless.
The Canucks' first month was highlighted by 5-0 and 3-0 wins against the Ducks (returning the favour for their home opener) and Avalanche, respectively. With a different goalie in net for each win, Schneider and Luongo's matching shutouts reflected the month's central storyline in Vancouver. Whose team is this?
For the first time since the tandem was established, the pressure is squarely on Schneider to perform and it's Luongo who's playing with nothing to lose. With the exception of Schneider's shutout against Anaheim, it shows.
As pervasive as the crease drama continues to be, however, goaltending wasn't the only emerging storyline in Vancouver to start the year. It's been nine months since the Canucks' first-round exit, but playoff Edler is still here. And judging by Jason Garrison's play, he's contagious. Meanwhile, Mason Raymond actually looks like he could score 25 goals in this league again. And finally, Zack Kassian. (No explanation necessary.)
As a 3-2-2 record suggests, you take the good with the bad. Luckily, if there's one place Edler can play defence, it's in BTD's Top 5 Plays of the Month. January edition. Enjoy!
-HC
Labels:
2013,
Alex Edler,
Canucks,
Cory Schneider,
Daniel,
goal,
Henrik,
January,
Jason Garrison,
Mason Raymond,
month in review,
plays,
Roberto Luongo,
save,
Sedin,
shootout,
top,
video,
Zack Kassian
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Alex Burrows: The backhand deke
It's as dependable as an NHL lockout every ten years or so. If Burrows is skating alone across the blueline, the goalie will still be playing the shot by the time the puck's been roofed on the backhand. Alternatively put by the Pass it to Bulis bloggers, "When Burrows challenges a man to a duel, he fakes a forehand slap before going backhand."
With his new four-year deal in hand, Burrows is Vancouver's most recent man of the hour in this current NHL off-season purgatory. Over the course of his present four-year bargain, he has honed his backhand deke into near-legendary status among Canucks circles – on par with say...Naslund's wrister from the half boards or Salo's blueline slapshot. Just wait til it happens against Mike Vernon in a playoff game and the internet will light up with blogs named in the goal's honour.
The now-trademark move has been pulled off more times than logic really should allow, but exactly how often are we talking here? Among his 149 regulation and shootout goals, no less than 16 times.
Including the very first time he pulled it off, against Edmonton four years ago, here's every single one:
Of the 16 goals scored, 8 were in a shootout, 5 were short handed and 3 at even strength. There were five instances this past season, 6 in 2010–11, 2 in 2009–10, 2 in 2008–09 and 3 in 2007–08. The most telling breakdown of the 16 goals, however, is that every last one was crucial to the outcome of the game. If it wasn't a shootout goal, Burrows either tied the game or put Vancouver ahead or within one (the lone exception being the Toronto goal in which he brought Vancouver within two), further cementing his reputation as a timely scorer.
Here's to 16 more breakaway dekes over the next four years...
-HC
*See the discussion regarding this post on the Canucks.com forums here.
With his new four-year deal in hand, Burrows is Vancouver's most recent man of the hour in this current NHL off-season purgatory. Over the course of his present four-year bargain, he has honed his backhand deke into near-legendary status among Canucks circles – on par with say...Naslund's wrister from the half boards or Salo's blueline slapshot. Just wait til it happens against Mike Vernon in a playoff game and the internet will light up with blogs named in the goal's honour.
The now-trademark move has been pulled off more times than logic really should allow, but exactly how often are we talking here? Among his 149 regulation and shootout goals, no less than 16 times.
Including the very first time he pulled it off, against Edmonton four years ago, here's every single one:
Of the 16 goals scored, 8 were in a shootout, 5 were short handed and 3 at even strength. There were five instances this past season, 6 in 2010–11, 2 in 2009–10, 2 in 2008–09 and 3 in 2007–08. The most telling breakdown of the 16 goals, however, is that every last one was crucial to the outcome of the game. If it wasn't a shootout goal, Burrows either tied the game or put Vancouver ahead or within one (the lone exception being the Toronto goal in which he brought Vancouver within two), further cementing his reputation as a timely scorer.
Here's to 16 more breakaway dekes over the next four years...
-HC
*See the discussion regarding this post on the Canucks.com forums here.
Labels:
Alex Burrows,
backhand,
breakaway,
Canucks,
deke,
fake,
goal,
leg kick,
shootout,
shot,
video
Friday, July 06, 2012
The Kesler effect: Booth to hit 30?
Of all the Canucks players not named Luongo or Schneider
this off-season, perhaps the only one to make any noise has been David Booth (See: Hunting video misguidedly published online). Whether the Canucks winger should be
condoned or criticized or his bear-hunting practices is borderline irrelevant completely up to non-hockey-related debate.
For that reason, it’s unfortunate that any mention of him until training camp
will likely redirect attention to that incident (one Province column even
facetiously asked in a headline, “Would Canucks trade David Booth after bear bait
incident?”), cause speaking hockey, Booth represents the Canucks' central X-factor for the upcoming season. If there's one player whose impending breakout season the team will benefit most from, it's Booth. So to the multitudes on the Canucks.com forums heralding Zack Kassian for that role, sorry, but no.
When Gillis traded for Booth last October, the Canucks essentially flipped Mikael Samuelsson and change for a younger, more exciting version of the aging Swede. At his best, Samuelsson represented valuable second-line scoring and upwards of fifty points you can bank on. By comparison, Booth delivered 16 goals and 30 points over 62 games in a first year with Vancouver interrupted by major injury. On a points-per-game basis, that ranked sixth among team forwards, behind the Sedins, Burrows, Kesler and Higgins. That’s not quite as eye-popping as one of his forays to the front of the net can be, but it’s not a hugely underwhelming performance. It's also consistent with his expectation to contribute top-six numbers.
When Gillis traded for Booth last October, the Canucks essentially flipped Mikael Samuelsson and change for a younger, more exciting version of the aging Swede. At his best, Samuelsson represented valuable second-line scoring and upwards of fifty points you can bank on. By comparison, Booth delivered 16 goals and 30 points over 62 games in a first year with Vancouver interrupted by major injury. On a points-per-game basis, that ranked sixth among team forwards, behind the Sedins, Burrows, Kesler and Higgins. That’s not quite as eye-popping as one of his forays to the front of the net can be, but it’s not a hugely underwhelming performance. It's also consistent with his expectation to contribute top-six numbers.
Still, the organization and fans will undoubtedly, and even
justifiably, want more in 2012–13. The
need is even greater with Kesler sidelined for the first month-and-a-half… though
playing without a bonafide centre to start the campaign will logically work
counteractively towards that.
On the flip side, consider that even with a winger capable
of scoring, Kesler became even more unwilling to make a pass last season. (I don't care how many goals you scored two years ago, you can't shoot the puck through the defenceman's skates on every single rush.) With Kes gone until mid-November, it could
spark Booth to take more responsibility for his performance on the second line.
He will conceivably have more puck-time
and, consequently, more opportunity to prove why fans voted him for the Most Exciting Player Award at the end of the regular season. For the former Panthers cornerstone, a return to 30-goal form is not out of the question, even after his multiple concussions in 2009–10.
Though he's been inconsistent in his short tenure with the
Canucks, the upside to Booth is that when he does make something happen, everybody notices. It's legitimate reason to hope he can be a major part of this team for a long time. A little over a month ago, I wrote an article
highlighting Henrik Sedin’s top five assists from the previous season. So without further ado, as determined by Bure’s
Triple Deke... Booth’s top five plays from 2011–12:
It makes Canucks fans and management alike salivate at what level he could attain if he did it on a consistent basis.
It makes Canucks fans and management alike salivate at what level he could attain if he did it on a consistent basis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)